THE FORMER

remember when i said this:

"i feel like this could go one of two ways:

either i will give up after a week or so

or

this could be successful."

the former was correct. well, only partially so. i didn't last more than one post. if i would've lasted more than a week, that be successful. that would be the later. is there a term for that in the blogging world? 

so i failed. i've learned something about failures in my life (i've had quite a few). that is- when you fail, you learn how not to do something. it reminds of this quote that my brother introduced to me, i have no idea who it is by, so i'll give credit to austin.

if you want something that you've never had before,

you'll have to do something that you've never done before.

see, it's kinda like what i said. only the inverse. if i want to be successful at this:

a: i can't give up after each post. i learned that from failing after one post.

b: i have to post. i learned that because it's something that i've never (read: basically never) done before. 

funny how much you can learn from an older brother and a personal failure. so without further a due, and after 2 months, 5 days, 13 hours, and 48 minutes (thank you elapsed time calculator). i am posting again. this post is purely about me posting again. no content. is that lame? i promise i won't do it again. in fact, i'll post again later tonight. because i've got stuff to go to called singles stake meetings. i have to go do things and be clay. all day.